tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post7002875277149918121..comments2023-12-05T21:35:46.941-08:00Comments on Letters From The Governing Body Of Jehovah's Witnesses: The Watchtower Rejects the League of Nations?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-2418479247158223822020-01-24T09:36:44.836-08:002020-01-24T09:36:44.836-08:00"that is why God lets a deluding influence mi..."that is why God lets a deluding influence mislead them"you mean to say as in false signs an miracles not something like operation of error like signing with the UN.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16854175694877673879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-57405344944567903242012-09-14T00:24:57.969-07:002012-09-14T00:24:57.969-07:00Hello. I'd like to have the whole article plea...Hello. I'd like to have the whole article please and not quotes and extracts. If somebody here - JW or not - can help, it will be highly appreciated. Thanks.Christakoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03260028194247813516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-1823929566527467052012-09-14T00:24:19.020-07:002012-09-14T00:24:19.020-07:00Hello. I'd like to have the whole article plea...Hello. I'd like to have the whole article please and not quotes and extracts. If somebody here - JW or not - can help, it will be highly appreciated. Thanks.Christakoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03260028194247813516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-9847088568349559722008-07-29T01:54:00.004-07:002008-07-29T01:54:00.004-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-55079500520962258162008-07-29T01:54:00.003-07:002008-07-29T01:54:00.003-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-68084250938874710932008-07-29T01:54:00.002-07:002008-07-29T01:54:00.002-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-5330678921046436592008-07-29T01:54:00.001-07:002008-07-29T01:54:00.001-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-20172414254132842962008-07-29T01:54:00.000-07:002008-07-29T01:54:00.000-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-84113120209409548262008-07-29T01:53:00.001-07:002008-07-29T01:53:00.001-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-39447424782293977602008-07-29T01:53:00.000-07:002008-07-29T01:53:00.000-07:00Just thought this should be posted again.Maybe som...Just thought this should be posted again.<BR/><BR/>Maybe some will respond to it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Once again the author of this blog misrepresents truth and twists information for his own agenda. <BR/><BR/>It is interesting to note that a certain quote from the Wt. Feb 15, 1919 issue is left out.<BR/><BR/>Wt Feb.15 1919-<BR/>“there can be no lasting League of Nations unless these are in league with God”<BR/><BR/>Thus, it’s actually evidence that attention was really being directed to God for the solution to mankind’s problems.<BR/><BR/>Note what is written in the very next issue of the Watchtower (March 1, 1919) under the subheading “The World’s Only Hope”<BR/><BR/>“Those who know that the Christ and his kingdom constitute the only lasting remedy for the wrongs and the woes of men should be pointing the groaning creation to this fact rather than to the poultices of human contrivance, which can do no real good.”<BR/><BR/>Also declared in the same Watchtower issue of March 1, 1919-<BR/><BR/>“Lasting relief to suffering humanity will come neither through human uplift nor through any league of nations, however desirable such an arrangement might be, but only through the power of Christ…”<BR/><BR/>It is also of note that the proposal for the League of Nations was approved Jan. 25, 1919. This was only 1 week before the Watchtower issue of Feb. 1, 1919 was released. In fact the Covenant to created the League was signed on June 28, 1919 and the League did not fully come into existence until Jan 10, 1920. Could it be that the writers of the time did fully understand the total overall function or agenda that the League would have as it didn’t even come into being until almost a full year after the comments published in the Watchtower of Feb. 1919? And while they did extol the virtues the league was trying to upheld, they still pointed to God and his Son as the only hope for true peace and Mankind’s salvation.<BR/><BR/>So a comment to the author of this blog:<BR/>Please stop scouring the internet for misleading information. And if you are going to post information that you have pilfered from other sites at least make sure this information is not out of context. Because when you do, it actually puts the validity of this blog and your credentials into question.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-3298435202333522482008-07-28T14:20:00.000-07:002008-07-28T14:20:00.000-07:00Kimmy Jo:You said:""We visit these apostate sites ...Kimmy Jo:<BR/><BR/>You said:<BR/>""We visit these apostate sites because Jesus said in John 3:16 to exercise your faith in Jesus. This is good exercise.""<BR/><BR/>"That's ok though, you keep coming back and defending the world wide organization of JW's,"<BR/><BR/>Yes, I do defend the faith. The religion of which 7 million belong and only 2000 are in the Watchtower.<BR/><BR/>" and denying the Watchtower as their "mediator" between them and the true God."<BR/><BR/>Yes, I deny that because it is not true.<BR/><BR/>" The "exercise" of your returning here will eventually open your eyes to TRUTH."<BR/><BR/>No, it shows me that antiJWs are pathetic atheists and they have no relationship with God so it shows me what to do to not be like them, i.e. not to worship the Watchtower like your do and to have faith.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115946270655365230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-69368024798627559772008-07-28T13:56:00.000-07:002008-07-28T13:56:00.000-07:00Anon:Whatever...but "As an ex-JW AND atheist, I ha...Anon:<BR/><BR/>Whatever...<BR/><BR/>but "As an ex-JW AND atheist, I have every right to be here. "<BR/><BR/>Well, you just proved it.<BR/><BR/>When people leave Jehovah God, they leave Him.<BR/><BR/>What more can be said?Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115946270655365230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-5321756890553568472008-07-28T11:16:00.000-07:002008-07-28T11:16:00.000-07:00And yet once again!!!!! Will no one have the coura...And yet once again!!!!! Will no one have the courage to respond with honesty and admit that the quote given in this blog from the Feb. 1919 WT. was misrepresented and taken out of context?<BR/><BR/>The evidence has been presented and yet ignored.In actuality, it is proof that you all prefer the lie instead of the truth.<BR/><BR/>Paul spoke truly when he said in 2 Thess. 2:11,12 :<BR/><BR/>"So that is why God lets an operation of error go to them, that they may get to believing the lie, in order that they all may be judged because they did not believe the truth but took pleasure in unrighteousness."<BR/><BR/>Peaceno onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-46379976164458113012008-07-28T05:41:00.000-07:002008-07-28T05:41:00.000-07:00ronde, Now I know for sure you are a new JW...beca...ronde, <BR/>Now I know for sure you are a new JW...because this statement and scripture goes completely contrary to Watchtower teachings....SO MUCH FOR SERVING JEHOVAH GOD "SHOULDER TO SHOULDER UNITY!!! You continue to stick your foot in your mouth.<BR/><BR/>You said:<BR/>"We visit these apostate sites because Jesus said in John 3:16 to exercise your faith in Jesus. This is good exercise."<BR/><BR/>That's ok though, you keep coming back and defending the world wide organization of JW's, and denying the Watchtower as their "mediator" between them and the true God. The "exercise" of your returning here will eventually open your eyes to TRUTH.<BR/><BR/>Then again, you are one of the 7 million wandering...waiting for "new light", "SERVING IN UNITY!!! WITH ONE BELIEF!!! ONE PURPOSE" With the Watchtower as your god..I mean guide.kimmy johttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11299679338323442475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-77471931702847112632008-07-28T02:49:00.000-07:002008-07-28T02:49:00.000-07:00Perhaps it's because you've not yet taken the plun...Perhaps it's because you've not yet taken the plunge and become baptised... in which case guess who's the idiot. Defending something you're not even fully aware of.<BR/><BR/>As an ex-JW AND atheist, I have every right to be here. <BR/><BR/>Your pathetic attempt at theocratic warfare (if you even know what that means) is just that: pathetic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-42871629978947168932008-07-27T20:13:00.000-07:002008-07-27T20:13:00.000-07:00Anonymous,(because you don't have the courage to p...Anonymous,(because you don't have the courage to publish YOUR name):<BR/><BR/>Thank you for proving the validity of my previous post,<BR/><BR/>"I don't really expect anyone to respond to this post with anything but the same rhetoric that everyone else has grown accustomed to on here."<BR/><BR/>It is so easy to sling mud at others. But what people forget to realize is when you sling mud at others you tend to get dirty yourself. <BR/><BR/>And once again no one is willing to respond to my orignal post in this thread. Evidence is presented that the quote from the Feb. 1919 Watchtower is taken out of context and misrepresented.<BR/><BR/>But I guess if people are bent on hatred and deception responding to proven errors and misrepresentations in their statements are unimportant.<BR/><BR/>And please note, I DO have the courage to use my real name. And I even go as far as including a pic of myself. I have nothing to hide behind. Why do others throw out serious accusations and then feel the need to sheepishly hide behind anonymous pseudonyms?no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-65199281834099446282008-07-27T16:27:00.000-07:002008-07-27T16:27:00.000-07:00Anonymous, you are an idiot."If you're a true wors...Anonymous, you are an idiot.<BR/><BR/>"If you're a true worshipper of Jehovah, you shouldn't be on this site. Period."<BR/><BR/>Well, You are correct as the Israelites stoned the evil among them and that is what we should be doing to this site.<BR/><BR/>"So what are you still doing here? If you think you're right, why don't you obey the organisation like they tell you to, by avoiding apostate sites such as this?"<BR/><BR/>Well, since we can't stone it, we have to keep stating the the blog owner is 'stoned'.<BR/>Obey the organization? what does that mean? We are the organization so how can I obey myself?<BR/><BR/>"As an atheist, I find"<BR/><BR/>If you are an atheist, what are you doing here?<BR/><BR/>"blog doesn't have to give their real name,". Of course Randall Watters and Danny Haszard do not have to because they are scum already.<BR/><BR/>"so the elders".<BR/><BR/>Since this is not a congregation thing, it is not the congregation's business.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115946270655365230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-19303100506116360832008-07-27T13:08:00.000-07:002008-07-27T13:08:00.000-07:00If you're a true worshipper of Jehovah, you should...If you're a true worshipper of Jehovah, you shouldn't be on this site. Period. So what are you still doing here? If you think you're right, why don't you obey the organisation like they tell you to, by avoiding apostate sites such as this?<BR/><BR/>As an atheist, I find worship of any god, whether Jehovah or Allas disgusting - there's no shame in it. It's the only rational and logical conclusion to make, once you decide to stop sucking the ass of the WTBS and actually READ your beloved bible (whether the NWT or any other version)<BR/><BR/>If you're not scared of anonymity yourself, why aren't you giving your name and congregation so the elders, etc can perform the necessary judicial action for failing to abide by the rules of 'Jehovah's mouthpiece'? The author of this blog doesn't have to give their real name, especially when there are pathetic defenders who attempt to defend the organisation, yet prove by mere virtue of their being on this site, that they themselves cannot follow the organisation!<BR/><BR/>I love my 'wicked conduct' as you put it. It's a damn sight better than your presumably 'loving' conduct, which is clear for all to see on this site. And your attempts at defence make you look even more pathetic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-26487301687655758692008-07-27T12:01:00.000-07:002008-07-27T12:01:00.000-07:00A person so cowardly to where he calls himself ano...A person so cowardly to where he calls himself anonymous said: "Interesting that the defenders of this disgusting religion insist on visiting apostate sites, such as this, AGAINST the wishes of the said religion,"<BR/><BR/>So you call the worship that Jehovah God prescribes, disgusting? Shame on you. That is what this religion is about.<BR/><BR/>We visit these apostate sites because Jesus said in John 3:16 to exercise your faith in Jesus. This is good exercise.<BR/><BR/>"I hope the owner of this blog never stops exposing this religion for the mindless cult that it is."<BR/><BR/>Well, if he is doing such a fantastic job, why the anonymity?<BR/>So who is mindless after all?<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>"You're doing a fantastic job, and there must be lots more people like myself who appreciate your efforts."<BR/><BR/>Because you think that this excuses your wicked conduct, but putting down the Watchtower does not bless you at all.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115946270655365230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-16283889661929309272008-07-27T11:57:00.000-07:002008-07-27T11:57:00.000-07:00Warren,They are simply using this material as an e...Warren,<BR/><BR/>They are simply using this material as an excuse for them to stop serving Jehovah with the congregation. <BR/><BR/>They know that this is the truth but they want to do their own thing and they think that since it is not perfect, i.e. the president of the Watchtower is not as perfect as Jesus, then they think that excuses them from the congregation and from true worship.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115946270655365230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-9799148009990692722008-07-27T11:51:00.000-07:002008-07-27T11:51:00.000-07:00Interesting that the defenders of this disgusting ...Interesting that the defenders of this disgusting religion insist on visiting apostate sites, such as this, AGAINST the wishes of the said religion, making long and pointless posts - they're only fooling themselves.<BR/><BR/>I hope the owner of this blog never stops exposing this religion for the mindless cult that it is. You're doing a fantastic job, and there must be lots more people like myself who appreciate your efforts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-16801794677711102502008-07-27T10:39:00.000-07:002008-07-27T10:39:00.000-07:00Oh by the way, I should have said it.... I don't r...Oh by the way, I should have said it.... I don't really expect anyone to respond to this post with anything but the same rhetoric that everyone else has grown accustomed to on here.<BR/>Peace.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-17950544658692001002008-07-27T10:33:00.000-07:002008-07-27T10:33:00.000-07:00I find it sooooooo interesting that if an argument...I find it sooooooo interesting that if an argument is presented that is well documented and logically presented AND provides solid evidence that this blog is misrespresenting and twisting the truth, it is just ignored! People just glaze over it and continue on with hateful speech and deceptive lies. I think it truely speaks to the kind of people that are regularly lurking around here.no onehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504444200235760470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-48009283999325295552008-07-27T08:37:00.000-07:002008-07-27T08:37:00.000-07:00Kimmy Jo:"WITHOUT THE WATCHTOWER YOU ARE NOTHING B...Kimmy Jo:<BR/><BR/>"WITHOUT THE WATCHTOWER YOU ARE NOTHING BUT 7 MILLION PEOPLE WONDERING WHAT TO DO NEXT."<BR/><BR/>Oh really? What gives you that idea? Sure there are many whose ministry is just placing Watchtowers and Awakes, but hey, that is better than doing nothing.<BR/>Without the WTBTS, we would not have books and magazines but we would have the Biblical outline of the kingdom and the Christian congregation.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01115946270655365230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7952450681786201073.post-84695029392137710272008-07-27T06:53:00.000-07:002008-07-27T06:53:00.000-07:00ronde, you said "Speak against the Watchtower all ...ronde, you said <BR/>"Speak against the Watchtower all you want. We are not members of the Watchtower, never have and never will be. We are members of the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses."<BR/><BR/>I say,<BR/>WITHOUT THE WATCHTOWER YOU ARE NOTHING BUT 7 MILLION PEOPLE WONDERING WHAT TO DO NEXT. <BR/><BR/>"Neither Jesus nor Jehovah are wishy washy, NOR DO THEY ENDORSE ANY SUCH ORGANIZATIONAL WISHY WASHY NONSENSE."<BR/><BR/>You ask,<BR/>"How do you know that?"<BR/><BR/>BECAUSE IT IS A WORLDLY ORGANIZATION THAT IS MISLEADING MANY, FULL OF HYPOCRASY, GREED AND LIES. IT'S HISTORY IS PROOF OF THAT.kimmy johttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11299679338323442475noreply@blogger.com